A holiday park has lost its battle to overturn its failed bid to get permission for people to have caravans as their permanent homes.
Barham Leisure Ltd, which operates the Pampas Lodge site in Haddiscoe, near Beccles, hoped to remove a condition that restricts the use of its static caravans for holidays only.
But the bid was met with strong backlash from locals, who complained it would lead to too much traffic and that it would be a further burden on the limited services in the small village.
The Broads Authority (BA) received several letters of objections, with people also worrying about the flood risk to people living in the caravans.
It led the BA to decide to refuse the application due to the site being unsuitable and that the plans would "result in the loss of holiday accommodation" within the Broads network which would damage local tourism.
READ MORE: Storm brewing on the Broads as officials report torrent of abuse on Facebook
However, the applicant argued that the change in use of the statics would "provide significant economic and social benefits" as the people living in the "permanently occupied" caravans will spend and work locally.
However, the owners of the holiday park called for a rethink and appealed to the Planning Inspectorate to overturn the decision.
Diane Barham, one of the owners, said that demand for its caravans as holiday homes had fallen to "almost zero", leaving them struggling amid a "declining tourist trade".
occupied.
Speaking about the flood risk, she said that they already had permission for people to use the caravans as holiday homes 365 days a year. She argued this meant that changing the use of the properties to a permanent residence would not increase the risk of flooding as it was already there.
READ MORE: Bridge repairs could reopen flagship path after 10 years... but plan could hit a snag
However, the inspector sided with the BA and villagers, ruling that it was not a suitable location for a residential development due to "poor access to services and facilities".
In addition, they worried people would be in danger of being flooded, putting future homes at "unacceptable risk".
They also agreed that it could harm the local tourist economy.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel